Another hunting controversy you’ll never guess who is involved.

The Biden administration’s recent announcement regarding restrictions on hunting equipment has triggered a wave of opposition from the hunting community. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) has released its hunting and fishing rule for the upcoming season, which includes a ban on lead ammunition and fishing tackle in eight national wildlife refuges by 2026.

This decision has been met with strong resistance from sportsmen groups, who view it as a threat to their cherished traditions.

Lawrence Keane, the senior vice president of the National Shooting Sports Foundation, expressed his discontent, stating, “This is another instance of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service imposing rules that punish hunters, jeopardize conservation funding, and serve the interests of a select few, all without solid scientific evidence.”

He further criticized the administration for failing to prioritize scientific evidence and accused it of pursuing an anti-gun and anti-hunting agenda.

According to the proposed FWS rule, hunters will be prohibited from using lead ammunition or tackle in eight federally managed refuges, including popular destinations such as Blackwater in Maryland and Rachel Carson in Maine. The ban is scheduled to take effect on September 1, 2026.

The FWS claims that the rule is based on the “best available science” and cites concerns about the negative impacts of lead equipment on human health and wildlife.

Benjamin Cassidy, executive vice president for international government and public affairs at Safari Club International, voiced his concerns about the detrimental effects of these restrictions.

While the administration is claiming to expand hunting and fishing access on public lands, it is simultaneously implementing bans that create significant cost barriers for sportsmen and women across the country. Cassidy argues that these restrictions will impede Americans’ ability to enjoy the freedom of hunting and fishing on public lands.

The Biden administration’s move is part of a broader trend. In 2021, the Center for Biological Diversity sued the federal government over a rule that expanded hunting and fishing across millions of acres.

Rather than defending the rule, the Biden administration chose to settle with the environmental group and agreed to take further steps to restrict hunting and protect wildlife on national wildlife refuges. These lead ammunition and tackle bans are a direct result of that settlement.

Sportsmen and conservationists are urging Congress to take action in support of hunters and anglers. The Protecting Access for Hunters and Anglers Act, introduced by Sen.

Steve Daines and supported by 22 fellow Republicans, aims to prevent agencies like the FWS, Forest Service, and Bureau of Land Management from imposing lead ammunition or tackle bans without solid scientific evidence. It is crucial to defend the rights and traditions of hunters and anglers while also ensuring the conservation of wildlife.

The Biden administration’s decision to restrict hunting equipment has sparked a heated debate. Hunters nationwide are concerned about the encroachment on their rights and the potential consequences for the future of hunting.

It is vital for Republican lawmakers and supporters to rally together, champion the rights of sportsmen and women, and demand that hunting regulations be based on sound scientific evidence rather than political agendas.

Source Fox News